but one thing i've been wanting to cover for a very long time is a voice of reason in response to a very bitter, hateful, insecure and jealous person's blog. this has been bothering me because. as anyone who has known me for more than 15 minutes can attest, i hate lies and i cannot tolerate liars.
this person has taken her negativity and spewed it all around to denigrate all those unlucky enough to have come in contact with her, including my dear friends in Team VP, as best she could.
this person has taken her negativity and spewed it all around to denigrate all those unlucky enough to have come in contact with her, including my dear friends in Team VP, as best she could.
instead of addressing each and every entry of her blog, paragraph by paragraph, i will just address two items that have bothered me the most.
this person has incorrectly stated that the porn moratoriums in 2014 were mandatory. if she would just take a moment from her volatile and irrational temper, and check her facts, she would find that every article on the internet about the porn moratoriums in 2014 states that they were all voluntary, and not mandatory. the only time you see the word "mandatory" in these articles is when it mentions mandatory STD testing for the actors, and mandatory use of condoms in porn valley. there is not one word about a mandatory moratorium. furthermore, if you google "voluntary porn moratorium", you will see several pages of articles stating that they were, in fact, by the National Coalition for Free Speech's own words, all voluntary.
furthermore, these voluntary moratoriums addressed the major mainstream studios and not necessarily the amateur industry.
if everyone has been tested before an amateur shoot, and has not had any contact with anyone from a major mainstream studio after testing, it would be like saying that if you bought pet food from china that turned out to be tainted, you should not buy any dog food from idaho, either. this is not logical. one has nothing to do with the other. as long as appropriate measures are in place, there is no need to worry about the unsafe product from china if your dog has had no exposure to that particular dog food.
it's not trying to get away with something, or thinking that you are above the law, as she accused. it's just simply common sense.
another grievance brought up was the use of fake cum. here's the facts:
porn is fantasy (surprise!). does every pizza delivery boy, every maintenance man and every cable guy get to fuck their nubile, gorgeous, perfectly made-up, hairstyled, scantily clad, 6 inch heeled, firm and perky DD breasted, perfect asses, creamy skinned customers? in a perfect world, the answer would be, "fuck, yeah!" and the lines for job interviews for such fields would be very long indeed. but porn is fantasy. fake hair, fake tans, fake makeup, fake boobs, fake eyelashes, fake scenarios, sometime even fake boners using oral or injected medication, and, ladies and gentlemen, hold on to your hats, sometimes, even with the best of 'em, fake cum!
gasp!
yes, it's a dirty little secret in the porn industry that fake cum is used. and not just on amateur sets but, double gasp! on mainstream sets.
think about it. you are renting a studio, the expensive photography lightbulbs are burning, hair and makeup artists are on deck, the air conditioner is sucking expensive electricity, the director and cameramen are waiting, and waiting, and waiting, everyone is tired and wants to end the stupid shoot, and every minute costs money. and costing money cuts into your budget. but the guy can't cum. do you really think the porn studios are going to waste precious time and money by waiting and waiting and waiting for a guy who can't perform the "money shot?"
you don't need a master's degree to figure out the answer to that.
so, there are tricks of the trade. i won't give them all away, but if you google "porn fake cum" you will see some pretty elaborate recipes, certain lubes that look like cum once you've fucked using them (Silk, to name one), and two products that are commonly used in (gasp again!) mainstream porn: pina colada mix, and eucerin lotion.
i won't name names, but i talked to three men who have shot on mainstream pro sets, and all three men named those two products: eucerin, and pina colada mix. and all three men verified that, hell yes, fake cum is used by every studio they have shot with. not just amateur studios, but the major players.
now this person who blogged the whole fake cum controversy certainly did not put up any fight whatsoever when fake cum was used in her particular scene. she herself posted behind the scenes footage. footage, by the way, which was taken with no knowledge of any of the other participants in the room.
more about that later.
but, if she was so set against using fake cum, why didn't she say something? anything? in fact, not one peep was made by her in the behind the scenes footage she herself recorded.
this person also claims that personal information was publicly given out about her. however, in her own blog, she has posted screen shots that give out personal information about people with whom she has been in communication. this seems very hypocritical.
but let's say for the sake of argument, her personal information was outted first. perhaps this is her way of getting revenge by also posting personal information.
something to ponder: do two wrongs make a right? if you publicly state someone has wronged you by posting your private information, is it not also wrong for you to post their private information?
the beautiful eliza allure has posted a recording of this person showing what this person is really like. this person certainly cannot complain about this recording, as she herself is guilty of recording and then publicly posting videos taken without people's knowledge, and probably knows that if she makes too big a fuss about this recording, she would have to take down her own ill-gotten recordings.
so, as not one. not two, but three people who i admire have told me not to waste my time and energy on this person, i shall no longer do so. i did feel it was time somebody has a lasting public rebuttal to what was accused. and so i feel i have accomplished that goal. but i shall certainly waste no more time or energy on her.
instead, i shall let her very own words speak for her:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJGtSKyfxxY
furthermore, these voluntary moratoriums addressed the major mainstream studios and not necessarily the amateur industry.
if everyone has been tested before an amateur shoot, and has not had any contact with anyone from a major mainstream studio after testing, it would be like saying that if you bought pet food from china that turned out to be tainted, you should not buy any dog food from idaho, either. this is not logical. one has nothing to do with the other. as long as appropriate measures are in place, there is no need to worry about the unsafe product from china if your dog has had no exposure to that particular dog food.
it's not trying to get away with something, or thinking that you are above the law, as she accused. it's just simply common sense.
another grievance brought up was the use of fake cum. here's the facts:
porn is fantasy (surprise!). does every pizza delivery boy, every maintenance man and every cable guy get to fuck their nubile, gorgeous, perfectly made-up, hairstyled, scantily clad, 6 inch heeled, firm and perky DD breasted, perfect asses, creamy skinned customers? in a perfect world, the answer would be, "fuck, yeah!" and the lines for job interviews for such fields would be very long indeed. but porn is fantasy. fake hair, fake tans, fake makeup, fake boobs, fake eyelashes, fake scenarios, sometime even fake boners using oral or injected medication, and, ladies and gentlemen, hold on to your hats, sometimes, even with the best of 'em, fake cum!
gasp!
yes, it's a dirty little secret in the porn industry that fake cum is used. and not just on amateur sets but, double gasp! on mainstream sets.
think about it. you are renting a studio, the expensive photography lightbulbs are burning, hair and makeup artists are on deck, the air conditioner is sucking expensive electricity, the director and cameramen are waiting, and waiting, and waiting, everyone is tired and wants to end the stupid shoot, and every minute costs money. and costing money cuts into your budget. but the guy can't cum. do you really think the porn studios are going to waste precious time and money by waiting and waiting and waiting for a guy who can't perform the "money shot?"
you don't need a master's degree to figure out the answer to that.
so, there are tricks of the trade. i won't give them all away, but if you google "porn fake cum" you will see some pretty elaborate recipes, certain lubes that look like cum once you've fucked using them (Silk, to name one), and two products that are commonly used in (gasp again!) mainstream porn: pina colada mix, and eucerin lotion.
i won't name names, but i talked to three men who have shot on mainstream pro sets, and all three men named those two products: eucerin, and pina colada mix. and all three men verified that, hell yes, fake cum is used by every studio they have shot with. not just amateur studios, but the major players.
now this person who blogged the whole fake cum controversy certainly did not put up any fight whatsoever when fake cum was used in her particular scene. she herself posted behind the scenes footage. footage, by the way, which was taken with no knowledge of any of the other participants in the room.
more about that later.
but, if she was so set against using fake cum, why didn't she say something? anything? in fact, not one peep was made by her in the behind the scenes footage she herself recorded.
this person also claims that personal information was publicly given out about her. however, in her own blog, she has posted screen shots that give out personal information about people with whom she has been in communication. this seems very hypocritical.
but let's say for the sake of argument, her personal information was outted first. perhaps this is her way of getting revenge by also posting personal information.
something to ponder: do two wrongs make a right? if you publicly state someone has wronged you by posting your private information, is it not also wrong for you to post their private information?
the beautiful eliza allure has posted a recording of this person showing what this person is really like. this person certainly cannot complain about this recording, as she herself is guilty of recording and then publicly posting videos taken without people's knowledge, and probably knows that if she makes too big a fuss about this recording, she would have to take down her own ill-gotten recordings.
so, as not one. not two, but three people who i admire have told me not to waste my time and energy on this person, i shall no longer do so. i did feel it was time somebody has a lasting public rebuttal to what was accused. and so i feel i have accomplished that goal. but i shall certainly waste no more time or energy on her.
instead, i shall let her very own words speak for her:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJGtSKyfxxY
No comments:
Post a Comment